Lemma 2.32.

Let \(C\) be a category with pullbacks and geometric realizations, and assume that groupoid colimits are universal. Then the following three conditions are equivalent:

  1. The category \(C\) satisfies descent for groupoid colimits;

  2. Groupoid colimits are effective in \(C\);

  3. For every groupoid object \(\Gg\) the unit \(\Gg \to \check{C}_{\bullet}(\Gg_0 \to \abs{\Gg})\) of the adjunction from Lemma 2.31 is an isomorphism.

Proof
The equivalence between (1) and (2) is Lemma 2.22.From effectivity to the Čech nerve condition. Assume (2), and consider a groupoid object \(\Gg\). By setting \(\Gg^{+}_{-1} := \abs{\Gg} = \colim_{[n] \in \simp\catop} \Gg_n\), we extend \(\Gg\) to an augmented simplicial object \(\Gg^+_{\bullet}\). More precisely, this is the left Kan extension of \(\Gg\) along \(\simp\catop \hookrightarrow \simp\catop_+\). The first face maps define a transformation \(\Gg^+_{\bullet+1} \to \Gg^+_{\bullet}\) whose restriction to \(\simp\catop\) is cartesian by the groupoid condition. Effectivity therefore implies that the extended transformation is cartesian at the cone point. In particular, we obtain a pullback square
Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source
The top right corner is isomorphic to \(\Gg_0\), since the augmented simplicial object \([n] \mapsto \Gg_{n+1}\) over \(\Gg_0\) admits extra degeneracies. By Lemma 2.20, the augmented object \(\Gg^+_{\bullet}\) is therefore the Čech nerve of \(\Gg_0 \to \abs{\Gg}\), proving (3).From the Čech nerve condition to effectivity. Assume (3). The map \(\Gg_0 \to \abs{\Gg}\) is then an effective epimorphism for every groupoid object \(\Gg\), since its Čech nerve is \(\Gg\) and its geometric realization is \(\abs{\Gg}\).Consider a cartesian transformation \(X_{\bullet} \to Y_{\bullet}\) of groupoid objects, and set \(A:=\abs{X_{\bullet}}\) and \(B:=\abs{Y_{\bullet}}\). We must prove that the canonical map
\[u\colon X_0 \longrightarrow A \times_B Y_0\]
is an isomorphism. The map \(X_0 \to A\) is an effective epimorphism, so pullback along it is conservative by Lemma 2.29. After this base change, the map \(u\) becomes
\[X_0 \times_A X_0 \longrightarrow X_0 \times_B Y_0.\]
Condition (3) identifies the source with \(X_1\) and identifies \(Y_1\) with \(Y_0 \times_B Y_0\). Cartesianness of \(X_{\bullet} \to Y_{\bullet}\) then gives
\[X_1 \iso X_0 \times_{Y_0} Y_1 \iso X_0 \times_B Y_0.\]
Thus the base change of \(u\) is an isomorphism, and conservativity implies that \(u\) is an isomorphism. This proves effectivity of groupoid colimits.