Theorem 16.2.4 (Hinich (2020), Proposition 2.8.9, Winges (2026), Theorem 1.1). Let \(C\) and \(D\) be symmetric monoidal \(\infty \)-categories, which we identify with commutative algebras in \(\Cat _{\infty }\) with the cartesian monoidal structure. Then the Day convolution operad \(\oDay (\Mm _C,\Mm _D)\) exists, and is given by the following pullback square:

Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source

Proof. Let us write \(\Dd \) for this pullback. We will show directly that \(\Dd \) satisfies the defining universal property of \(\oDay (\Mm _C,\Mm _D)\). It will suffice to produce for any \(\infty \)-operad \(\Pp \) a natural equivalence \[ \Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,\Dd ) \simeq \Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp \times \Mm _C, \Mm _D). \] For the left-hand side, note that \(\Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,-)\) commutes with pullbacks. Since \(\Comm \) is the terminal \(\infty \)-operad, we have \(\Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,\Comm ) \simeq *\). Since operad morphisms from \(\Pp \) into a cartesian operad correspond to \(\Pp \)-monoids by Theorem 15.3.11, we obtain equivalences \[ \hspace {-5pt} \Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,\OpCart _{\Ar ^{\oplax }}) \simeq \Mon _{\Pp }(\Ar ^{\oplax }), \qquad \Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,\OpCart _{\Cat _{\infty } \times \Cat _{\infty }}) \simeq \Mon _{\Pp }(\Cat _{\infty } \times \Cat _{\infty }). \] It follows that the \(\infty \)-category \(\Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp ,\Dd )\) is equivalent to the fiber of the map \[ \Mon _{\Pp }(\Ar ^{\oplax }) \to \Mon _{\Pp }(\Cat _{\infty }) \times \Mon _{\Pp }(\Cat _{\infty }) \] over the pair \((C_{\Pp },D_{\Pp })\), where \(C_{\Pp }\) and \(D_{\Pp }\) are obtained from \(C\) and \(D\) by precomposition with the operad map \(p_{\Pp }\colon \Pp \to \Comm \). By Theorem 16.2.2, this fiber is the \(\infty \)-category \(\Fun ^{\Pp \dlax }(C_{\Pp },D_{\Pp }) = \Fun _{(\Op _{\infty })_{/\Pp }}(\Mm _{C_{\Pp }/\Pp }, \Mm _{D_{\Pp }/\Pp })\) of lax \(\Pp \)-monoidal functors \(C_{\Pp } \to D_{\Pp }\). By the definition of \(C_{\Pp }\) and \(D_{\Pp }\) we have \[ \Mm _{C_{\Pp }/\Pp } \simeq \Pp \times _{\Comm } \Mm _C \qquadtext { and } \Mm _{D_{\Pp }/\Pp } \simeq \Pp \times _{\Comm } \Mm _D, \] hence \[ \hspace {-6pt} \Fun _{(\Op _{\infty })_{/\Pp }}(\Mm _{C_{\Pp }/\Pp }, \Mm _{D_{\Pp }/\Pp }) \simeq \Fun _{(\Op _{\infty })_{/\Pp }}(\Pp \times _{\Comm } \Mm _C, \Pp \times _{\Comm } \Mm _D) \simeq \Fun _{\Op _{\infty }}(\Pp \times _{\Comm } \Mm _C, \Mm _D), \] where the second equivalence uses the universal property of pullbacks. Since \(\Comm \) is terminal, the fiber product \(\Pp \times _{\Comm }\Mm _C\) is the product \(\Pp \times \Mm _C\) in \(\Op _{\infty }\). This was precisely what we wanted to show. □

Generated from the authoritative LaTeX source.