6.2. Groupoid actions and principal bundles

In this section, we discuss actions of groupoid objects in a topos \(T\) and prove that the category of such actions is equivalent to the slice over the classifying object. We then characterize principal bundles as regular actions with effective-epimorphic atlas and show that they are classified by maps into the classifying object. Our treatment is based on [Nikolaus et al. 2015] and [Sati and Schreiber 2021, Section 3.2], where the analogous situation for group actions is discussed.

Throughout this section, we fix a topos \(T\) and a groupoid object \(\Gg\colon \simp\catop \to T\).

6.2.1. Actions by groupoid objects

We introduce the notion of an action of a groupoid object, generalizing the treatment of group actions in [Sati and Schreiber 2021].

Definition 6.27.

Let \(\Gg\) be a groupoid object in \(T\), and let \(X \in T\) be an object. An action of \(\Gg\) on \(X\) consists of the following data:

  1. A groupoid object \(\Gg \ltimes X\) in \(T\);

  2. An isomorphism \((\Gg \ltimes X)_0 \simeq X\);

  3. A cartesian natural transformation \(c\colon \Gg \ltimes X \to \Gg\) of simplicial objects in \(T\).

We let \(\Act_{\Gg}(T) \subseteq \Grpd(T)_{/\Gg}\) denote the full subcategory spanned by the \(\Gg\)-actions in \(T\).

Remark 6.28.

Let \(\Gg \ltimes X\) be an action of \(\Gg\) on \(X\). Since \((\Gg \ltimes X)_0 \simeq X\), the map \(c\colon \Gg \ltimes X \to \Gg\) induces a structure map \(c_0\colon X \to \Gg_0\). Since \(c\) is a cartesian natural transformation, there are cartesian squares

Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source

and in particular we obtain isomorphisms \begin{align*} (\Gg \ltimes X)_1 &\simeq \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} X, \\ (\Gg \ltimes X)_2 &\simeq \Gg_2 \times_{\Gg_0} X \simeq \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} X, \end{align*} and so on. Under these isomorphisms, the map \(d_1\colon (\Gg \ltimes X)_1 \to (\Gg \ltimes X)_0\) corresponds to a map \(a\colon \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} X \to X\), which we think of as the action map. The rest of the simplicial diagram \(\Gg \ltimes X\) encodes the data witnessing that this action is unital and associative up to coherent homotopy.

Definition 6.29.

For a groupoid object \(\Gg\), we define its classifying object as the geometric realization \(\bB \Gg := \abs{\Gg}\).

If \(\Gg \ltimes X\) is an action of a groupoid object \(\Gg\) on an object \(X \in T\), we define the quotient \(X \quot \Gg\) as the geometric realization of \(\Gg \ltimes X\):

\[X \quot \Gg \quad:=\quad \abs{\Gg \ltimes X} \quad\simeq\quad \colim_{[n] \in \simp\catop} \Gg_n \times_{\Gg_0} X.\]

The cartesian transformation \(\Gg \ltimes X \to \Gg\) induces a map \(X \quot \Gg \to \abs{\Gg} = \bB\Gg\) on geometric realizations, and this defines a functor

\[-\quot\Gg \colon \Act_{\Gg}(T) \to T_{/\bB\Gg}.\]

The following result shows that groupoid actions are classified by the classifying object:

Proposition 6.30. (Classification of groupoid actions)

The quotient functor is an equivalence of categories:

\[-\quot\Gg \colon \Act_{\Gg}(T) \iso T_{/\bB\Gg}.\]
Proof
Recall from Lemma 2.33 that sending a groupoid \(\Gg\) to the map \(\Gg_0 \to \bB \Gg\) defines an equivalence
\[\Grpd(T) \; \iso \; \EffEpi(T)\]
between the categories of groupoid objects and effective epimorphisms in \(T\). Moreover, it follows from descent that a morphism of groupoids \(f\colon \Hh \to \Gg\) is cartesian if and only if the induced square
Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source
is a pullback square, giving an equivalence of categories \(\Grpd(T)^{\cart} \; \iso \; \EffEpi(T)^{\cart}\). Passing to slices over \(\Gg\), this results in an equivalence
\[\Act_{\Gg}(T) \quad = \quad (\Grpd(T)^{\cart})_{/\Gg} \quad \iso \quad (\EffEpi(T)^{\cart})_{/(\Gg_0 \to \bB \Gg)} \quad \iso \quad T_{/\bB \Gg}.\]
Here the last equivalence is induced by the target map. Restricted to cartesian morphisms over the fixed effective epimorphism \(\Gg_0\to\bB\Gg\), this functor is an equivalence: its inverse sends a morphism \(B \to \bB\Gg\) to the pullback square
Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source

6.2.2. Free and transitive actions

Given a \(\Gg\)-action in \(T\), one can define when the action is free or transitive. Actions which are both free and transitive will correspond to principal \(\Gg\)-bundles.

Definition 6.31. (Shear maps)

Let \(\Gg \ltimes X\) be an action of a groupoid object \(\Gg\) on an object \(X\) in \(T\). We define the shear map of \(\Gg \ltimes X\) as the map

\[\shear_1 = (a, \pr_X)\colon \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} X \to X \times X,\]

where \(a\colon \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} X \to X\) is the action map and \(\pr_X\) is the projection onto \(X\).

More generally, we define the higher shear maps as follows. The atlas \(X\to X\quot\Gg\) is an effective epimorphism, and the equivalence of Lemma 2.33 identifies the action groupoid \(\Gg\ltimes X\) with its Čech nerve \(\check{C}(X\to X\quot\Gg)\). Consider now the commutative square

Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source

Regarding this as a morphism from \(X \twoheadrightarrow X\quot\Gg\) to \(X \to *\) in \(\Ar(T)\) and passing to Čech nerves, we obtain a morphism of groupoid objects

\[\shear\colon (\Gg \ltimes X) \to \check{C}(X \to *).\]

Under the identifications of Remark 6.28, this may be displayed as follows:

Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source

Definition 6.32. (Free, transitive and regular actions)

Let \(\Gg \ltimes X\) be an action of a groupoid object \(\Gg\) on an object \(X \in T\). We say that this action is

  1. Free if its shear map \(\shear_1\) is a monomorphism;

  2. Transitive if its shear map \(\shear_1\) is an effective epimorphism;

  3. Regular if its shear map \(\shear_1\) is an isomorphism.

Note that \(\Gg \ltimes X\) is regular if and only if it is both free and transitive.

In case the morphism \(X \to *\) is an effective epimorphism in \(T\), regularity of \(\Gg \ltimes X\) can be expressed as the triviality of the quotient:

Lemma 6.33.

Let \(X \in T\) be an object such that \(X \to *\) is an effective epimorphism. Let \(\Gg \ltimes X\) be an action of a groupoid object on \(X\). Then the action is regular if and only if the quotient \(X\quot\Gg\) is the terminal object of \(T\).

Proof
First assume that \(X\quot\Gg \simeq *\). Then the map \(X \twoheadrightarrow X\quot\Gg\) is equivalent to the map \(X \to *\). It follows that the shear map \(\shear\colon (\Gg \ltimes X) \to \check{C}(X \to *)\) is an isomorphism, being defined by applying Čech nerves to these two equivalent morphisms.Conversely, assume that \(\Gg \ltimes X\) is regular and that \(X \twoheadrightarrow *\) is an effective epimorphism. The map \(X\quot\Gg \to *\) is obtained from the higher shear map \(\shear\colon (\Gg \ltimes X) \to \check{C}(X \to *)\) by passing to colimits. It thus suffices to show that each higher shear map \(\shear_n\colon \Gg_n \times_{\Gg_0} X \to X^{n+1}\) is an isomorphism. Both its source and target are groupoid objects with object of objects \(X\). By the Segal condition, their terms in degree \(n\) are the \(n\)-fold iterated fiber products of their terms in degree \(1\) over \(X\), and \(\shear_n\) is the corresponding iterated pullback of \(\shear_1\). Since \(\shear_1\) is an isomorphism by regularity, every \(\shear_n\) is an isomorphism.

6.2.3. Principal bundles

Given a groupoid object \(\Gg\) in \(T\) and an object \(B \in T\), we obtain a notion of principal \(\Gg\)-bundles over \(B\) by applying the definition of regular actions to the slice topos \(T_{/B}\). Observe that \(\Gg\) gives rise to a groupoid \(\Gg \times B\) in the slice \(T_{/B}\) by applying the pullback functor \(B \times -\colon T \to T_{/B}\). For every object \(P \in T_{/B}\), there is an isomorphism

\[(\Gg_n \times B) \times_{\Gg_0 \times B} P \;\simeq\; \Gg_{n} \times_{\Gg_0} P \qquad\text{in } T_{/B},\]

and thus a \((\Gg \times B)\)-action on \(P\) is the same as a \(\Gg\)-action on the underlying object of \(P\) for which the map \(P\to B\) is invariant. For this reason, we will refer to a \((\Gg \times B)\)-action in the slice \(T_{/B}\) simply as a \(\Gg\)-action over \(B\).

Definition 6.34. (Principal bundles)

Let \(B \in T\) be an object and let \(\Gg\) be a groupoid object in \(T\).

  1. Let \(p\colon P \to B\) be an object of \(T_{/B}\) equipped with a \(\Gg\)-action over \(B\). We say that \(p\) is a formally principal \(\Gg\)-bundle over \(B\) if this action is regular as a \((\Gg \times B)\)-action in the slice \(T_{/B}\), i.e. if the shear map

    \[\shear_{1}\colon \Gg_1 \times_{\Gg_0} P \iso P \times_B P\]

    is an isomorphism.

  2. A formally principal \(\Gg\)-bundle \(p\colon P \to B\) is called a principal \(\Gg\)-bundle if \(p\) is an effective epimorphism.

  3. We write

    \[\Bun_{\Gg}(B) \quad \subseteq \quad \Act_{\Gg\times B}(T_{/B})\]

    for the full subcategory of principal \(\Gg\)-bundles over \(B\).

Remark 6.35.

For any morphism \(f\colon B' \to B\) in \(T\), the pullback functor \(f^*\colon T_{/B} \to T_{/B'}\) preserves principal \(\Gg\)-bundles.

Lemma 6.36.

Let \(p\colon P \twoheadrightarrow B\) be an effective epimorphism equipped with a \(\Gg\)-action over \(B\), and let \(P\quot\Gg \in T_{/B}\) denote the quotient. Then \(p\) is a principal \(\Gg\)-bundle if and only if the canonical map \(P\quot\Gg \to B\) is an isomorphism.

Proof
This is an instance of Lemma 6.33 applied in the slice topos \(T_{/B}\).

It follows from Lemma 6.36 that the forgetful functor from principal \(\Gg\)-bundles over \(B\) to \(\Gg\)-actions in \(T\) lands in the fiber over \(B\) of the composite

\[\Act_{\Gg}(T)\xrightarrow{-\quot\Gg}T_{/\bB\Gg}\longrightarrow T.\]

Proposition 6.37.

The forgetful functor induces an equivalence of categories

\[\Bun_{\Gg}(B) \iso \Act_{\Gg}(T) \times_{T} \{B\}.\]
Proof
We construct an explicit inverse. Consider a \(\Gg\)-action \(c\colon\Gg \ltimes P\to\Gg\) in \(T\) equipped with an isomorphism \(B \iso P\quot\Gg\). The colimit cocone exhibiting \(B\) as the realization of \(\Gg\ltimes P\) supplies compatible maps \((\Gg\ltimes P)_n\to B\) and hence lifts the action groupoid to a groupoid object in \(T_{/B}\). Pairing these structure maps with \(c\) gives a morphism of groupoid objects
\[\Gg\ltimes P\longrightarrow\Gg\times B\]
in \(T_{/B}\). Its underlying morphism in \(T\) is \(c\), so it is cartesian and therefore defines a \((\Gg\times B)\)-action in the slice. This construction defines a functor
\[\Act_{\Gg}(T) \times_{T} \{B\} \to \Act_{\Gg\times B}(T_{/B}).\]
The map \(P\to B\) is an effective epimorphism because it is the atlas of the realization of the groupoid object \(\Gg\ltimes P\), and its quotient in \(T_{/B}\) is the terminal object \(B\to B\). Thus Lemma 6.36 shows that the resulting action is principal. Conversely, starting from a principal bundle, the same lemma identifies its quotient with \(B\), and the colimit cocone recovers its original structure maps to \(B\). Hence the two constructions are inverse.

We are now ready to state the main classification result:

Theorem 6.38. (Classification of principal bundles)

Let \(\Gg\) be a groupoid object in \(T\) and let \(B \in T\) be an object. There is an equivalence of categories

\[\Hom_{T}(B,\bB\Gg) \iso \Bun_{\Gg}(B),\]

given on objects by sending a morphism \(c\colon B \to \bB\Gg\) to the principal \(\Gg\)-bundle \(P \to B\) defined by the pullback square

Commutative diagram generated from the LaTeX source
Proof
Recall from Proposition 6.30 the equivalence \(-\quot\Gg \colon \Act_{\Gg}(T) \iso T_{/\bB\Gg}\), which induces an equivalence on fibers over \(T\):
\[\Act_{\Gg}(T) \times_{T} \{B\} \;\simeq\; T_{/\bB\Gg} \times_{T} \{B\} \;\simeq\; \Hom_{T}(B,\bB\Gg).\]
The inverse sends a morphism \(c\colon B \to \bB\Gg\) to the base change \(P = B \times_{\bB\Gg} \Gg_0 \twoheadrightarrow B\) of the atlas \(\Gg_0 \twoheadrightarrow \bB\Gg\) along \(c\). Combining with the equivalence from Proposition 6.37 finishes the proof.

Corollary 6.39.

For every groupoid object \(\Gg\) in \(T\) and every object \(B \in T\), the category \(\Bun_{\Gg}(B)\) is an anima.

References

  1. Thomas Nikolaus, Urs Schreiber, Danny Stevenson. Principal \(\infty \)-bundles: general theory. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct., 10 (4), 749–801. 2015.
  2. Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber. Equivariant principal infinity-bundles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.13654. 2021.